Arminian Today

A Jesus-Centered Arminian Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Sports

My Top Five Podcasts For 4/2016

I tend to jump around in my podcast listening so the following are the top five podcasts I would include for now.  A few, like Dr. John MacArthur and Grace To You, are always on my iPod.  These are listed in a random order.  I’m not saying I agree with all they teach by placing them here.  Be biblical in your thinking (1 Thessalonians 5:19-21).

  1.  Soteriology 101 with Professor Leighton Flowers
  2. The Dividing Line with Dr. James White
  3. Fighting For the Faith with Chris Rosenbrough
  4. Five Minutes in Church History with Dr. Stephen Nichols
  5. Pardon the Interruption (PTI)

Glory to the King!

Written by The Seeking Disciple

04/22/2016 at 12:48 AM

The Life of A Gamecock Fan

South Carolina lost a football game Saturday night to Kentucky.  45-38.  The score does not show the game.  South Carolina dominated the Wildcats.  The Gamecocks had over 500 yards of offense but the problem was the defense (as it has been all year).  The Gamecocks could not stop the same play over and over and over again.  The Wildcats ran the “wildcat” where a running back sets up in the shotgun and simply takes the snap and runs this way or that.  The Gamecocks defense had no answer and in the end the Wildcats won the game on the heels of the “wildcat” play and a pick six of our quarterback.

This loss left the Gamecocks at 3-3.  South Carolina has only lost a total of 6 games the past three years.  I fear that the Gamecocks will lose 6 to 7 games this year.  South Carolina should beat Furman and South Alabama but will struggle against Tennessee (a bad Vols team) and Florida (a bad Gators team) and will lose to Clemson (I dread even typing that).  South Carolina has won 5 straight games against our rivals, Clemson, but this is looking like their year this year.

For Gamecock fans, the loss to Kentucky hurt.  Kentucky is a basketball school.  They are a bottom dwelling SEC team.  Back in the late 1990’s, Hal Mumme had the Wildcats throwing all over the place and even landed Tim Couch (who became the first #1 pick for the Cleveland Browns in their return to the NFL).  The Gamecocks lost to Kentucky a bunch in the 1990’s but then came the 2000’s and the Gamecocks dominated the Cats.  South Carolina won 10 straight games against Kentucky before they upset the Gamecocks in 2010.  South Carolina is not Kentucky.  South Carolina has won 11 games three straight seasons and Kentucky has never won 11 games in their program’s history.  Kentucky is down there with Vanderbilt in our minds and history proves it.

So the loss hurts because South Carolina has not been Kentucky.  But this year we are.

Before 2010, South Carolina had always been a mediocre program.  I sat through the 1998-1999 seasons when we went 1-10 and 0-11.  We beat New Mexico State to open the 2000 season to snap the nation’s longest losing streak and our fans tore down the goalposts.  A week later South Carolina upset #9 Georgia 21-10 against Heisman hopeful Quincy Carter and our fans once again tore down the goalposts.  South Carolina went on to have 8-4 and 9-3 seasons in 2000 and 2001 with back to back wins over Ohio State in the Outback Bowl.  And then mediocrity kicked in again.  South Carolina struggled to 5-7, 5-7, and 5-7 seasons the next three years.  Under Lou Holtz we had some improvement but failed to beat the “orange” teams (Florida, Tennessee, and Clemson).  South Carolina beat Clemson in 2001 but would not again until 2006.

Now to document the level of mediocrity, South Carolina beat Clemson in 1987, 1991, 1994, 1996, 2001, and 2006 before the Gamecocks pounded Clemson from 2009-2013.  Five wins in a row compared to five wins in about 20 years against Clemson.  South Carolina, under Steve Spurrier, has beat Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama (who was #1 then), and Clemson multiple times.  South Carolina has beat Nebraska, Michigan, and Wisconsin in three straight bowl games.  South Carolina played Auburn for the SEC title in 2010 (a loss to Cam Newton led Tigers who won the national championship that year) and was in the top 25 for 62 straight polls before falling out this year.  The Gamecocks have produced NFL talent including the number 1 pick for the Houston Texans this year in Clowney.

Needless to say, we have been spoiled.  We are not use to 3 loses.  But we have short memories.  In 2009 South Carolina ended the season at 7-5 with a win over a favored Clemson team.  They turned around and lost to Connecticut in a minor bowl.  I was just happy with the win over Clemson.  That was the life of a Gamecock fan back in those days.  I was happy to just go to a meaningless bowl game but was very happy we beat Clemson.  In 2008 we had ended with a loss to Clemson and was destroyed by Iowa in the Outback Bowl.  I was happier with the 2009 results than the 2008 results.

I remember just hoping South Carolina would win 6 or 7 games.  I remember being happy when South Carolin won 10 games in 1984.  That year the Gamecocks had risen to #2 in the polls and had the chance to be the first (and still only) #1 team in the polls but lost to Navy (yes Navy!).  They finished 10-1 and faced Barry Sanders and Oklahoma State in the Gator Bowl.  South Carolina lost 21-14.  Until 2011, South Carolina had never won more than 10 games and only once (1984) had won 10 games.  The Gamecocks won 11 games in 2011, 2012, and 2013 when they had never won more than 11 games in the program’s history!

Until 1994, South Carolina was 0-8 all time in bowl games.  They beat West Virginia in the Carquest Bowl to snap their losing streak.  They would not win again until 2001.

My point in all this is that South Carolina has long been a tough place for success.  Steve Spurrier has brought the most success in our program’s history.  He has done so mainly with good defenses (which we don’t have this year) and a solid running game.  South Carolina will struggle this year and I fear that Spurrier will retire (though his pride probably won’t let that happen as he will want to go out with a big year).  This has been a rough season so far but South Carolina fans should remember the past and realize that this program once lived and died in mediocrity.

Written by The Seeking Disciple

10/06/2014 at 12:21 PM

My 2014-15 NFL Predictions

Here are my 2014-2015 NFL predictions.

NFC East Philadelphia Eagles

NFC South Atlanta Falcons

NFC North Green Bay Packers

NFC West Seattle Seahawks

NFC Wildcards New Orleans Saints, San Francisco 49ers

NFC Champion: Green Bay Packers

AFC East New England Patriots

AFC South Indianapolis Colts

AFC North Cincinnati Bengals

AFC West Denver Broncos

AFC Wildcards Miami Dolphins, San Diego Chargers

AFC Champion: New England Patriots

Super Bowl Champion: Green Bay Packers

Note: I had a tough time choosing this year.  I wanted to pick the Seahawks but most NFL teams struggle to just make the playoffs following a Super Bowl win.  I think the Seahawks won’t miss the playoffs since most of their team came back from last year.  However, I do think the Packers will get better as the year goes.  Aaron Rogers is a beast at QB for the Packers and if he remains healthy, the Packers will win.

The AFC is wide open.  The fan favorite is the Denver Broncos for their offense but I see Payton Manning not having the success he had last season.  I went out on a limb picking the Dolphins to make the playoffs.  I wanted to pick the Houston Texans with their defense (Watt and Clowney) but went with my gut feeling.  While the Pats are an old team, I think Tom Brady may pull one more out of the hat and give the Packers a great Super Bowl game.

Written by The Seeking Disciple

09/06/2014 at 11:33 PM

Posted in Sports

Tagged with , ,

Thoughts on the MLB All-Star Game

When I was a kid, the MLB All-Star game was fascinating to watch.  It was cool to see players from the National League taking on the best from the American League.  Yes there was the fan voting that typically allowed players who were not the best at their positions get on the teams as starters but they were usually pulled after one at bat and a few innings on the field to allow better players to play.

Now the All-Star game is suppose to mean something more than an exhibition game.  After the tie debacle in 2002, MLB made the winner of the All-Star game the home field advantage team in the World Series.  I wonder if this is real motivation for the Allstars?  Perhaps a team in first such as Oakland might care but most teams don’t.  I see no point in making an exhibition game into the deciding factor for home field in the World Series.  Before 2002, MLB alternated the home field advantage between the leagues.  I think what works best is the best record of the teams heading into the World Series.  Last year, St. Louis and Boston had the same records but St. Louis had a slightly better divisional record.

The All-Star game also use to have more meaning before inter-league play.  Now that teams regularly play each other, the All-Star doesn’t feature never before seen match ups.  I can remember the 1980’s when Nolan Ryan would be facing Dave Winfield or Orel Hershiser facing Jose Canseco.  Now we regularly get this week after week with inter-league play.

But I will say that out of the three major sports in the United States, the MLB All-Star game is the best.  I am not an NBA fan and find their 133-130 score at their All-Star game to be pointless.  I find the NFL All-Pro game to be the worst.  In their passion not to get hurt, NFL players at the All-Pro game allow for easy scores, easy catches, easy tackles, etc.  In other words, a pointless game.  At least MLB players appear to try.

In the end, I think that the MLB All-Star game should be what it use to be: an exhibition with nothing on the line.  These guys should count it an honor to be an MLB All-Star and play with passion for the fans.  This is what the game is about after all: the fans.

Written by The Seeking Disciple

07/15/2014 at 11:11 AM

Posted in Sports

Tagged with , ,

Thoughts on the 2014 World Cup

I am not a soccer fan.  Have never been.  When I was a child, we played some form of soccer at recess when I was in school but I never played it on a team.  I played all other major sports: football, baseball, and basketball.  In fact, my time in my neighborhood revolved around the three big sports here in the United States.

After every World Cup, we get to hear how soccer is rising in the United States.  Just the week I heard a soccer guy say that more children in the US are now playing soccer than playing baseball.  He feels that in 20 to 30 years, the US will have a dominate soccer program at the World Cup level.  One British soccer coach said that the Yanks will outplay England in just a few years.

For me, I don’t care.  I am not a soccer fan.  It is a boring sport to watch.  I suppose if I played soccer, it might interest me more but it is boring to watch matches that are 0-0 for the entire game.  Give me 24-14.  Give me 10-6.  Give me 99-92.  The 2014 World Cup final featured Germany and Argentina.  I was working while the match was being played but I didn’t even know who won till nearly 2 AM.  I had to come home and pull up Fox Sports on my computer to know.  And even then, I don’t really care.  I just wanted to know the score and sure enough, Germany had to win in extra time because the match was scoreless.  When Germany beat Brazil 7-1, I thought that that was a great score but 0-0 is boring.  I want to see goals to keep my interest.

The flopping is also a bothersome point for me.  Players will roll over the ground claiming to be hurt while barely getting touched by an opposing player.  This act of lying is troublesome from a Christian worldview.

Do I think soccer will take off here in the United States?  I think it can become a big sport but it will not out gain the NFL anytime soon.  The NFL is huge!  Soccer can make gains over baseball because (like soccer), baseball can be boring to watch (exceptions would be the playoffs and the World Series).  I actually think the real sport that soccer can challenge here in the United States is not football, baseball, or basketball but hockey.  No one here in the South plays hockey and no one that I knows even cares who won the NHL Stanley Cup (LA Kings won it).  Here in the South, football is dominate and especially college football.  Entire towns revolve around their local football teams.  I know of towns that nearly the entire town turns out for their Friday night games.  Football carries most sports programs in the South.

Soccer?  Well time will tell.  A high school football game will average 10,000 people while a soccer game might have 100.  A college football game (here in my area) will average 85,000.  A soccer game might get 1000.  The top MLS team in attendance are the Seattle Sounders (40,000) but most MLS teams average under 20,000.  The top NFL team in attendance was the Dallas Cowboys (88,000) with the NFL average over 70,000 per game.

I don’t doubt that the World Cup will generate some interest for a while for soccer fans but it will be a long time before soccer is a dominating sport here in the United States.

Written by The Seeking Disciple

07/14/2014 at 12:03 PM

Posted in Sports

Tagged with , , , , , ,

Why Jackie Robinson and Michael Sam Are Not The Same (And Never Will Be)

Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier of Major League baseball in 1947.  Robinson made baseball better because of it.  Robinson also was a star on and off the field even after his retirement from baseball.  His number “42” remains the only number to be retired by all MLB clubs to this day and I suspect it will forever be that way (though Hispanics want Roberto Clemente’s number retired in all clubs as well).

Today ESPN and others are pushing for Michael Sam to be hailed too for he is about to be the first openly homosexual player in NFL history.  We are being told over and over and over again how brave Sam is for doing what he is doing and how he is changing the game the way that Robinson changed baseball (and sports) for the better in 1947.  Sam is being compared to Robinson in every way.

But there are major differences between the two.

First, Robinson, before 1947, was banned from Major League baseball for one reason: his skin color.  This was nothing he could change.  Sadly, many Negro League players could have been MLB stars had they been given the right to just play baseball.  Great Negro League players such as Josh Gibson, Satchel Paige (when he was in his prime), and many others.  We also forget that Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, and many other black players started in the Negro Leagues because of racism.

Racism is profoundly different from homosexuality.  A man cannot change the color of his skin.  His skin is sacred because his skin color has been given to him by God.  Underneath, a black man is no different from a white man nor a white man different from an Asian man.  Our skin pigmentation might be different but inside, we are still humans.  A black man could marry an Asian woman and produce offspring that while mixed in their skin color, they would still be human.  Skin color then is precious before God.  Racism is the sin of thinking that one skin color is better than others.  We must remember God’s promise in Galatians 3:28, “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you all one in Christ Jesus” (NIV).  This is not taking away our unique sex given to us by God nor our skin color nor our language, etc.  It is simply pointing out that in Christ Jesus, we are one.  God’s children are those who have been baptized into Christ (Galatians 3:26).  In reality, God sees people either as in His Son or outside of His Son (John 3:36; Colossians 1:13).  We are either sheep or goats (Matthew 25:31-46).

Jackie Robinson could never change his skin color.  But he could be a great baseball player.  And he was.  He won the 1947 National League Rookie of the Year and went on to lead the Dodgers to the 1947 World Series (which they lost).  He won the National League MVP award in 1949.  By the end of his career (10 years!), Robinson would retire with a .311 career average.  He hit 137 home runs and stole 197 bases.  His team was in the World Series 6 out of the 10 years he played and won the World Series in 1955 (by the way, Robinson’s Dodgers were 1-5 against the New York Yankees in all those World Series’).  Robinson was elected to the Hall of Fame in 1962.

Now Sam has yet to play a down in the NFL so it’s actually not fair to pit stats from Robinson against him and they do play two different sports but my point is that Robinson was proving something, he was showing the world that the color of a man’s skin has nothing to do with his talents.  Robinson was showing that a black man could play with the white players in the Majors.  His skin color had nothing to do with his greatness on the field.  Robinson was elected to the Hall of Fame for being a great baseball player first and foremost and not just for the fact that he was the first man of color to play in the Majors.  I suppose that would have been the case had he not had a great career but Robinson left no doubt about his talents.

On the other hand, Sam is being praised for being the first openly homosexual in the NFL.  Again, he has yet to play a down.  Most are picking him to be a mid round pick meaning that he still needs some work to become a great NFL player.  Perhaps he will be but perhaps he will not.  Yet sports writers are praising Sam as if he is Robinson, as if he has performed at the same level.  He has not.  Not yet.

Further, Robinson was a humble man.  When asked why he was trying to make it with the Dodgers, Robinson simply said, “I just want to play baseball.”  Robinson knew what was at stake but he also knew that baseball was meant to be colorblind.  After all, a box score doesn’t show a man’s color.  It only shows what he and his team did that day.  Robinson opened the door for other men of color from blacks to Hispanics to Japanese to become Major Leaguers.  He is right to be praised.

Sam has made one decision here.  He has announced he is a homosexual.  A position, by the way, that he could change (1 Corinthians 6:9-11).  Robinson never had that chance.  Sam has been praised for his sexual desire and lauded by ESPN as being so brave to go into the “manly” NFL as an openly homosexual player.  This is an issue of choice and not an issue of skin color.  To this day there is no proof that a person is born a homosexual.  It is a lifestyle choice.  It is a choice about sex.

Robinson (and others before him) were banned from baseball because of their skin color.  A fact they could not change nor needed to.  This was not a choice.  This was not a sin.  The sin was others racism toward them and not their own.

Sam has not been banned from the NFL.  In fact, the NFL nor any other professional clubs ban homosexuals or any other person from trying out for them.  They are concerned only with helping their teams win.  If you can make the team, you are in the NFL.  Homosexuality is not the same as the skin color ban of the former professional sports.  Not even close.  Jason Collins is still playing in the NBA as an openly homosexual player.

In closing, I wish Sam no ill will.  Perhaps he will make a great NFL player.  Perhaps not.  Either way, I don’t think this will be because of his homosexuality.  If Sam makes it in the NFL, it will because he played good football.  Meanwhile, Sam (who is black), will play next to all skin colors.  None of them will be banned from playing for their skin color.  Nor will Sam be banned from playing because of his sexual desires.  But Sam will play because of Jackie Robinson.  Had Robinson not done what he did in 1947, Sam would not be allowed to play in the NFL nor would he have played for Missouri in college.  He would be watching or playing in a Negro League because of his skin color.  Robinson changed that.

In the end, Sam will never be like Jackie Robinson.  Robinson’s skin color was obvious.  He represented a whole group of people who were banned from the Majors for one reason: racism.  Homosexuals are not the same.  There are black, white, Hispanic, Jewish, etc. homosexuals.  There are no people groups whom we can point to and say, “Homosexuals” like they could at Robinson.  Homosexuals are linked together by one prominent idea: a sexual preference.  Skin color is not even an issue.  These two men were completely different and represented totally different things.

Let us pray for Michael Sam.  He can be transformed by God’s grace and mercy.

Written by The Seeking Disciple

03/23/2014 at 7:00 PM

%d bloggers like this: