Archive for the ‘Faithfulness to God’ Category
Having come face to face with my own sinfulness, my own lack of keeping the law of God, I have spent the last several months looking at the law and the gospel. While this is not new to Christianity, it is fairly new to me. I grew up in a church environment that was heavy on the law. You keep the law and God was happy. Break the law (which was often), God is now angry with you. The gospel was not the end but only a step to helping me keep myself clean. It was not Jesus period. It was Jesus who now enables me to keep the law and when I fail, back to the beginning.
We all sin. None of us are perfect. We read passages such as Romans 3:23 and acknowledge the universal sinfulness of mankind. But we miss the point that we are sinners ourselves. I am not arguing that we wake up each day thinking “what can I do today to violate the law of God” but we do sin. Whether we make sins into categories such as “sins of omission” and “sins of commission,” either way we do sin. Apart from grace, none of us can stand before a holy God. It is only through Christ that we can stand before a holy and totally pure God. The reason Christ died for my sins is not simply to enable me to be holy on my own power but He died because I am a sinner in need of forgiveness because I do sin (1 John 2:1-2).
Consider the command of Jesus in Matthew 22:37-40:
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Stop and consider how you are doing with that one? I’m not even good at it. I would love to say that I love God perfectly as Jesus taught. I would love to tell you that my love for God flows into loving my neighbor as myself. But the reality is that I fall way short of these two commands and Jesus said that law and the prophets hang on these two commandments. Do these and you’ll be perfect! But I don’t!
And thus the gospel comes into play. The law condemns me as a sinner (Romans 3:19) and the law teaches me that I need a Savior (Galatians 3:24). The law condemns me. The gospel saves me. The law shows me that I am a sinner (Romans 7:7). There is nothing wrong with the law of God (Romans 7:12) but the problem is me. I can’t keep the law. No matter how hard I try, I fail.
The gospel preaches peace to me. The law tells me to love God perfectly and my neighbor perfectly (Matthew 5:48). The gospel tells me Christ died for my sins and the sins of not loving God perfectly nor my neighbor as myself. The law tells me to love my wife as Christ loves His Church (Ephesians 5:25). The gospel tells me that Christ died for the sin of not loving my wife as Christ loves His Church (I am far from a perfect husband). The law tells me to pray, to worship, to evangelize, to give my money to the poor and to helping the kingdom of God, to do good to my neighbor especially of those of the household of faith, etc. but the gospel tells me that Christ died for my sins even the sins of not keeping the law perfectly.
Martin Luther taught two (and I would add a third) uses of the law. Lutherans debate the third use of the law. The three uses of the law are:
- For society, to curb man’s sinfulness.
- To condemn us a sinners and show us our need for salvation.
- To help the Christian in sanctification.
These three uses of the law are seen not just in the Bible but in life. Antinomians accept the first two uses of the law but not the third. I believe in preaching all three. Christians need to hear the law so that the Holy Spirit can help us in the process of sanctification. So for example a believer hears that we should pray (Luke 18:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:17). Prayer itself doesn’t justify us before God. We are justified only through Christ Jesus alone by grace alone though faith alone. Yet none would say that prayer is bad. Yet prayer can become a law. It was that way for me. I once held that a person should pray for 2 hours a day or God was not pleased. Prayer became a law and gospel for me. But prayer is not the gospel. The gospel is the death of Jesus for our sins and His resurrection for our justification (Romans 4:24-25; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4). Thus Jesus died for my sin of prayerlessness. Does this mean that I should not pray since Jesus died for my sin of prayerlessness? By no means! The key is to see prayer as flowing from my forgiveness and not from the law. I pray because Christ shed His blood for me (Hebrews 4:14-16).
This holds true of any law. The law if holy and good (1 Timothy 1:8-11). The law shows me how far I am far from the perfection of God. But the gospel shouts to me that I am accepted in the Beloved. I am holy before God because of Christ (Hebrews 10:10, 14) and not by my works. The law tells me to pursue holiness (Hebrews 12:14; 1 Peter 1:15-16) and this is good. The gospel tells me that I am accepted in Christ Jesus who bled and died for my sins (Romans 5:6).
This understanding of the law and the gospel has blessed me. It has brought some joy to my soul where joy has been lacking. For so long I have been full of pride, my own self-righteousness. I thought God was honored by my prayer life, my evangelism, my passion for God. Like Voddie Bauchman preaches, my works-righteousness muscle likes to flex. I would have, in the past, gladly acknowledged Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior and would have gladly told you that I was saved by His grace alone but in reality I was full of pride, thinking more highly of myself than I ought (Philippians 2:3). I would have preached Christ but my focus was not on pleasing Christ per se but on men seeing how much I “loved” Jesus. Oh how much pride was in my heart! Oh wretched sinner that I was!
But Christ died for me. Christ bled and suffered for my sins. Jesus gave His life for my sins and now I am forgiven not because I keep the law but because I can’t keep the law (Galatians 3:10). Christ suffered in my place, for my sins (Galatians 3:13-14). I am saved now not because I keep the law but because of faith in Jesus Christ who gave His life for my sins. What a blessing! What a Savior!
I have no problem with the law. The law is good. The law comes from our holy God. Yet too many Christians try to live the law. You will always be falling short. Always. You will never obtain holiness by the law. Even if you think (as I did) that I had obtained a level of holiness by my striving, inside (like me) you’ll know that you stand condemned because you can’t keep the whole law (James 2:10). I have no problem preaching the law and calling Christians to repent of not keeping the law. But the balance of this is the gospel. The answer to not keeping the law is not more law. The answer is the gospel. The law condemns us as sinners. The gospel comforts us by pointing to Christ who died for our sins (2 Corinthians 5:18-21).
Perhaps I am wrong on this. I don’t think so. I believe it’s biblically based. I know that this teaching has pushed me closer to Christ and not away. I still hate sin. I really do hate sin. I acknowledge that I do sin but I hate my sins. I am so grateful to God for giving me His Son for my sins (John 1:29). I stand condemned but Christ preaches to me no condemnation (Romans 8:1). Satan accuses me of sin and he is right to do so. But I trust in Christ alone for my salvation (Hebrews 7:25). Jesus has promised not only to save me from my sins (Matthew 1:21; Romans 6:1-4) but He has promised to keep me (Jude 24-25). I trust in Christ alone and not my works-righteousness before a holy God.
This past week we saw the resignation of Perry Noble from New Spring Church. New Spring is the largest church in South Carolina (where I live) with over 30,000 people on various “campuses” throughout the state. There is a church near me as I write this. I am reluctant to call it a church but I will.
It amazed me from the start that people enjoyed Perry Noble. I was not a fan. When I first heard of him I took a listen to one of his “sermons” and instantly thought it was shallow, seeker sensitive and lacked biblical truth. It was clear that Noble was not a theologian and he just proof texted his sermons. Every single talk I heard from Noble was topical. Noble was often shown to be a gifted speaker but I found it lacking in many ways. Noble was more about entertaining the crowd than actually teaching the Word of God which is the duty of the elders of the Lord’s church (1 Timothy 3:2). Paul’s admonishment in Acts 20:28-32 is worth reading and noticing that most of the seeker guys don’t come close to abiding in this.
New Spring always boasted of reaching “thousands” with the gospel. I never heard the gospel from them. I have listened to many, many talks from New Spring but the gospel is missing unless you mean “bow your heads and close your eyes.” The “sinner’s prayer” is not the gospel. Getting people to raise a hand and say a prayer is not the gospel. Just getting people to be baptized is not the gospel. The gospel is clear in 1 Corinthians 15:1-11. New Spring would proclaim “833 saved in all our campuses this weekend” but the “gospel” was noting more than “bow your head, close your eyes, repeat this prayer.”
Having talked to New Spring people on the streets, I learned early on that these people didn’t have a clue about the gospel. I would share with them the law of God to convict them of their sins and their eyes would be opened to their need to repent and believe the gospel but in my presence, none did. They always believed they were right with God because they “said the prayer.” When I would talk to them about repentance, they didn’t have a clue. Noble would mention sin but repentance was often lacking in his talks.
I found that New Spring had an idolatrous view of Perry Noble. He was their superstar. He was their everything. People went to hear the “kicking praise band” and the great motivational talk from Noble. Now that Noble is gone, the void of the superstar will be seen. I suspect that Clayton King will fill that roll. While King seemed to be more “biblical” he still has a long way to go to be a true biblical preacher of the gospel. King shares Noble’s pragmatism, his love of shocking “Christians” and he shares in Noble’s “sinner prayer” salvation methodology.
Having interacted with a few New Spring folks, I found the church to be shallow, prayerless, and lacking the gospel. Sadly, I knew a few Arminian brothers who thought that New Spring was a great model for churches. I disagreed with them publicly and was clear that I would never follow Noble nor the New Spring model. Why not just follow the Bible instead? Why be pragmatic and always looking for the newest, best model for drawing in
For those who truly did repent because of God’s grace and mercy at New Spring, I often have prayed that they would leave and find a biblical church that is preaching the Word of God faithfully. Noble often attacked those who loved theology and he ridiculed those who wanted to “go deeper” in their study of the Bible. New Spring claimed to be “all about souls” and their passion, claimed Noble, was for people to be saved. Yet week after week, Noble would rise up, give a TED talk, ask people to say a prayer and proclaim by the end of the day via Twitter how many people had “prayed to receive Christ.”
Here is my prayer for New Spring: that the elders would repent and denounce the pragmatism brought to them by their founder Perry Noble. That Clayton King (if he is the man who takes over) would repent and preach the gospel (and not the sinner’s prayer model). I pray that holiness would be preached and practiced. I pray that prayer, revival, passion for the gospel, truth, and sound doctrine would reign over New Spring. I pray the focus would not be on numbers but on pleasing the Lord. Faithfulness to God is what matters the most in serving the King (2 Timothy 2:2).
I know these are my own thoughts and I don’t claim to speak for anyone. I know that I am critical of New Spring and have been since I first heard of them. When I first heard of them, I heard that people were coming to faith in Christ by the hundreds at a Baptist church in Anderson, SC. I thought, “Wow, maybe this is a biblical church preaching the gospel.” How sad I was when I first heard Noble give a talk. I thought back to 2 Timothy 4:2-3 and realized that Noble was just that. The “thousands” coming to faith in Christ were nothing more than people saying a magical prayer not found in the Bible.
May the Lord give us all a heart for His truth, to call people to repent and be baptized (Acts 2:38). Jesus alone saves by His grace alone through faith alone for His glory alone. The crucified Christ is the one we need to preach (2 Corinthians 4:5) and not ourselves. The Word of God must be preached for sinner’s to hear and be saved (Romans 10:17). May the Church preach the gospel to all sinners (Luke 24:47).
One of the things that troubles me about many Arminians is their utter lack of discernment. This is true of course for all believers and not just Arminians but I want to speak to my camp here. An upcoming event called “Together 2016” features many different people including Roman Catholics. For the life of me, I cannot understand how Protestants can join hands with Roman Catholics in any real sense until the Catholics renounce their Catholic beliefs. The very gospel is at stake here. This is not just about personal differences or traditions. This is a gospel issue.
The Roman Catholic Church denies the gospel. They deny justification by faith. They deny the finished work of the Lord Jesus Christ. They teach a form of works righteousness. They deny even declared righteousness imputed to the believer by God. They deny sola scriptura. They deny sola fide. They deny sola gratia. Everything that our Protestant forefathers did for the sake of the gospel, the blood shed in defense of the Bible and in defense of the gospel cannot be lost.
When you read the list of speakers for the “Together 2016” one not included (because he will not there in person) is the Pope. Yes the Roman Catholic pontiff (whom Arminius called the antichrist) will address evangelicals. Alongside the Pope will be men such as Lecrae (whom I have lost respect for), Dr. Tony Evans (whom I lost respect for sometime ago), and Dr. George Wood (the General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God). Before you think that only non-Calvinists are there, Calvinists such as Trip Lee and Francis Chan (who studied at the Master’s Seminary) will speak alongside the likes of Hillsong (who has wandered far away into something), Christine Cane, Lou Engle, and Mark Batterson.
What is disappointing about this is the lack of discernment. Can you imagine Arminius speaking where he knew the Catholic pontiff would be welcomed? Can you imagine the likes of a John Buynan or Charles Spurgeon preaching at this event? Would John Wesley join hands with known mystics to promote this “unity?” Would Leonard Ravenhill promote such an event?
I think the answer is clear.
Arminius wrote about the Roman Pontiff:
Since, therefore, the Roman Pontiff either attributes these most honourable titles of Christ to himself, or willingly suffers them to be ascribed to him; and since he evinces no horror at the blasphemy contained in these titles, and gives no tokens of his displeasure at this ascription of them; it follows, that he puts himself in the place of Christ, and is supremely opposed to Him. There is no excuse in the explanation which is given, that “the head and foundation is ministerial, and that he attributes all these things to himself under Christ, as having been elevated by the grace or favour of God and Christ to that dignity.” For the protestation is directly contrary to the fact; and he is so much the more the bitter enemy of God and Christ, as he the more confidently boasts of being defended by the authority of God and Christ. Such conduct is, in fact, under the semblance of friendship to exercise the deepest enmity, and, under the disguised pretext of a minister of light and of righteousness, to promote the interests of the kingdom of darkness and of unrighteousness. On this very account, therefore, we assert that the disparaging epithets which we laid down in our first Thesis, most justly belong to him; and this we now proceed to show by descending to particulars.
Arminius called the Pope the “pimp of the harlot Church.” He further wrote:
Although the Roman pontiff calls himself “the servant of the servants of God,” yet we further assert that he is by way of eminence, That Wicked And Perverse Servant, who, when he saw that his Lord delayed his coming, “began to smite his fellow-servants.” (Matt. 24:48.) For the Roman pontiff has usurped domination and tyranny, not only over his fellow- servants, the bishops of the church of God, but likewise over emperors and kings themselves, whose authority and dignity he had himself previously acknowledged. To acquire this domination for himself, and still further to augment and establish it, he has employed all kinds of satanic instruments — sophistical hypocrisy, lies, equivocations, perfidy, perjury, violence, poison, and armed forces — so that he may most justly be said to have succeeded that formidable beast which “was like unto a leopard, a bear and a lion,” and by which the Roman empire was prefigured — and to have “had power to give life unto the image of the beast, and to cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast, should be killed.”
I call on Arminians to follow in the footsteps of Arminius and denounce the Roman Catholic Church. I am not calling for hatred of Catholics themselves for they need the gospel. I am calling for a hatred of the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church. I am calling for biblical discernment (Jude 3-4).
We need to heed 1 Timothy 4:1-2. We need to heed 2 Timothy 4:3-4. We need to stand agains the Roman Catholic Church and preach against her false doctrines. We need to call Catholics to repent and believe the gospel.
I pray that men such as Dr. George Wood would not only decline speaking at the “Together 2016” event but denounce it. I pray that men and women of God would rise up and denounce the event altogether. In our troubled world we need the true gospel and not a mixing of errors. Now is not the time to lay down our swords in the midst of a sinful world. What is going to slay the evils we see of racism, sexual immorality, abortion, homosexuality, wicked killings, etc. is the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ (Romans 1:16-17). We lose the gospel. We lose the war.
When I was a boy, I was raised in the Assemblies of God. My family attended an AG church that was miles from us and we would wake up on Sunday mornings and drive over an hour to church. We did it twice on Sunday and then again on Wednesday evening. Eventually they planted an AG church on our side of town and we ceased driving that far.
In those days, our AG churches were clearly AG. Every AG church had the name “Assembly of God” somewhere in their name. Whether it was Airport Assembly of God, Trinity Assembly of God, Calvary Assembly of God, Northeast Christian Assembly of God, etc., the name “Assembly of God” was incorporated into the church. I remember the first AG church to not use “AG” in their name (Christian Outreach Center) and it was controversial to say the least. I remember hearing people say that COC was compromising and they were moving away from being Pentecostal.
Fast forward to today. In my city there are about 10 AG churches. Only two have the AG name. COC is gone but after COC, other churches begin to drop the AG name. This moved started in the late 1990’s when Rick Warren’s book The Purpose Driven Church was making its rounds among AG pastors. Soon they too were dropping the AG name in favor of “community church” names or just “Trinity Church.”
Now in fairness, I don’t think they all did this to be popular. Some would still gladly claim to be AG while not using AG in their names. Some were pragmatic and did see the “community church” movement and jumped in. I see it a different way and I’ll explain in this post.
First, in the late 1990’s there were two “moves” among the AG churches I was familiar with. There was the revival movement coming out from Brownsville Assembly in Pensacola, FL. Many thought Brownsville would drop the AG name or even leave the Assemblies of God altogether but they never did and still remain to this day in the AG with the name “Brownsville Assembly of God.” The Brownsville revival died out around 2002 and the other stream took over. This was the Rick Warren stream. Warren had even been invited to the General Council of the Assemblies of God, the first non-Pentecostal speaker ever to the Assemblies of God. Warren did not know it but he became the chief of church growth to many in the AG churches. I still remember pastors at AG ministers meetings I would attend in those days all boasting about reading and implementing Warren’s purpose driven styles. Some AG pastors I knew were even following Warren’s preaching style to the point of wearing Hawaiian shirts like Warren did. They dropped preaching out of the King James Version in favor of the New Living Translation because of Warren.
Secondly, this led to churches uniting around methodology and not theology. When I was a boy, the Assemblies of God were clearly Pentecostal churches. Our church was very Pentecostal in the worship and in the preaching. I remember talking to my father about the Baptist or Presbyterian churches and he would tell me they were indeed Christians but they didn’t know much about the Holy Ghost. Pentecostal theology was vital. I still remember hearing a Pentecostal pastor preach, “I fear the day when we will be Pentecostal in theology but not experience.” At every turn, Pentecostal theology was taught and emphasized. When a person got saved at our church, they were baptized in water and they told to seek God for the Holy Ghost. The wording might be wrong but they clearly knew their theology even if you don’t agree.
Fast forward to today. Most AG churches I am familiar with no longer emphasize doctrine at all. In fact, doctrine is often avoided at all costs. I personally have had an AG pastor tell me that theology does not matter. He felt doctrine was not livable and so he wanted to preach “life application sermons” rather than theology to his church. Where does this come from? Rick Warren!
I had another AG pastor friend who was going to plant an AG church. What did he do? In the old days, the AG’s would set up a tent and have the preacher hold tent meetings. This would usually draw small crowds at first and the preacher would preach on the need of the people to be saved and baptized in the Holy Ghost. Those who came and got saved or baptized in the Spirit were then included in the new church plant. The preacher would work until the church could support him (most stayed bi-vocational their entire lives). Now AG church planters usually get some money from the District and plant the church. They will attend numerous church growth conferences to learn the latest gimmicks to church growth. Gone are the days of fasting and prayer (though they say they still pray). In my friends case, he traveled to all sorts of churches many of them non-AG to learn their gimmicks. At one point I asked him (after he traveled to a large seeker church in the West) why he would want to learn from them since they are theological different than the AG’s? He replied, “Because they are growing and we can learn from them.” The bottom line is this: growth is desire and whoever is growing is who we look to. Theology is not the issue. Prayer and preaching is not the issue. Pragmatism is.
Now my point here is not to boaster the Assemblies of God. I have no dog in the fight. I am simply observing the church world from the bleachers. I understand the desire of pastors to be full-time. I was there. I am thankful I am not now. The pressure to grow your church (and yes its viewed as “your” church) is immense. Rather than learning how to preach, how to pray, how to fast, how to evangelize, etc. the emphasis is on the latest gimmicks to get people in the door. My friend above who planted an AG church uses every gimmick you can imagine from dropping Easter eggs from helicopters (thanks to Steven Furtick for that gimmick) to offering free movie tickets to attendees to giving away a new car. All gimmicks designed to get people in the door. Once they are there, he preaches goofy sermon series’ designed to “get them hooked to church.” Sin, repentance, holiness, even AG doctrines such as the baptism in the Spirit are not emphasized. Their “worship”service is am emotional rollercoaster full of sappy love songs to Jesus and make you feel like your a 14 year old at a junior high school dance rather than church. And my friend has one goal: numbers. It’s all about the growth. His mentors are all seeker sensitive pastors and he idolizes men such as Perry Noble and Andy Stanley.
Go back 50 years and not one AG pastor would have listened to a Perry Noble or Andy Stanley. Why? Because they were not Pentecostals! Pentecostals only listened to Pentecostals in those days. The attitude was that Pentecostals have the baptism in the Holy Ghost and Baptists do not.
Some see all of this “unity” as good. I don’t. Again, I’m not arguing for Pentecostal theology. In many ways, my theology is more Wesleyan now than Pentecostal. I still love Pentecostal people and while I do see theological errors among them (mainly among those who claim Pentecostal such as those in the Word-Faith camp), I would not classify myself as Pentecostal. What I see taking place is not unity around the gospel. I see unity around methods. John MacArthur warned that churches today are uniting around methodology and not theology. I agree. The lines are not blurred between the distinctives of the Pentecostal movement and those in the Baptist churches. Yet it is not theological unity that is taking place. It is emotional experiences that are unifying them.
There is no doubt that Jesus prayed for unity of His body in John 17:22-23. In 1 Corinthians 1:10 Paul the Apostle emphasized unity in theology. The people of God are unified who have been saved by the grace of God (Ephesians 2:14-21). Jesus is Head over His Church (Colossians 1:15-20). Jesus also knows those who are His own (John 10:27; 2 Timothy 2:19). Unity in the local church must be around theology. We must know what we believe and speak the same beliefs. Obviously, as sinful humans, we are not perfect in our understanding and we all need correction. This is why we need the church. The church helps us to know what we believe and maintain that belief through faithfulness and good works (Hebrews 10:23-25). The elders of the church help us to obtain this unity by teaching us the Word of God (Ephesians 4:11-16). Doctrine does matter (1 Timothy 4:16).
The balance of all this is to have both sound doctrine (Titus 2:1) and sound experiences. I don’t want to go to church to hear a theological lecture every time. We need a balance of sound doctrine with practical living. Notice this is how Paul taught in his epistles. He would teach theology and how to put it into practice. For example, Ephesians is six chapters. The first three chapters of Ephesians are theological in nature. The last three are application in nature. Our theology transforms our lives for better or for worst. This is why Paul would issue such a condemnation as in Galatians 1:6-9 over the issue of the gospel. Without sound doctrine, the gospel is lost. Salvation is gone. The Lordship of Jesus is robbed. Life is hopeless.
My friends, I urge you to pray for the Church of Jesus Christ. Pray for God to show us the need for sound doctrine. Pray for the Lord to us godly elders who are not leading for gain but for the love of Christ (1 Peter 5:1-5). Peter the Apostle wrote in 1 Peter 4:8, “Finally, all of you, have unity of mind, sympathy brotherly love, a tender heart, and a humble mind.” I want all this for myself and the church of God.
May the Lord be glorified in and among His Church!
Imagine a world where few are Christians. Most of the culture is full of idolatry. The love of money. The love of sports. The love of sex. The political leaders are corrupt. Politicians in general are corrupt and not trustworthy. The leaders of the nation are pagans and they despise the gospel. At every turn the nation is against the gospel it seems. They despise biblical authority, despise its truth, attack the truth of the gospel, attack those who follow Christ. They seek to cast Christians off as strange, aliens, and out of touch with reality. In fact, they believe Christians just want to destroy their fun!
Sounds just like the wicked nation I live in. But this nation is the Roman Empire at the time of the book of Acts. A wicked depraved time. One biblical commentary stated that the Roman empire was much worse in terms of Christian persecution, rejection of biblical authority, etc. than any time in history. We might could point to the communists nations that openly hated God but few compare to the Roman Empire. It heavily persecuted Christians and killed many of them including most of the Apostles for their faith in the Lord Jesus. While the Romans were busy worshiping idols and the emperor, the Christians were calling for them to repent and turn to Christ (Acts 17:30-31).
What gives me hope is that the gospel transformed the empire. From its humble beginnings in Acts 2, by the time we finish with the book of Acts we find Paul the Apostle in Rome preaching the kingdom of God (Acts 28:30-31). The very next book in our Bibles is the book of Romans with a church alive and well in Rome (Romans 1:7). The book of Revelation (which I know some will take exception with me here because of my preterism) was written to encourage persecuted saints of God (Revelation 1:9) in the Roman Empire. The book of Revelation promised them victory (Revelation 2:1-7 for example). They are told that Jesus is “Lord of lords and King of kings” (Revelation 17:14). Our victory is sure for Jesus is our King! This was the hope for the saints of God! It is our hope as well!
We look around at our wicked world. Here in the United States we see violence, hatred, lack of respect for authority, pride, all types of wicked sins including idolatry and sexual immorality. We see the wicked sin of abortion where millions of people are being slaughtered all in the name of conveyance and sexual sins. We see lying politicians and corrupt leaders now openly attacking the gospel and questioning God’s absolute authority in all things. We see Christians bowing their knees to the false gods of money, power, sex, sports, and all types of wickedness. We no doubt live in an evil age.
Yet I have hope in the gospel. The gospel promises the sure victory of Jesus (Psalm 110:1). Jesus will win (1 Corinthians 15:24-26). The gospel will go forth and we have victory through Christ alone (Matthew 28:18-20). The nations belong to our King (Psalm 2:8). While the United States and other nations may be wicked, they will not last forever. Only the kingdom of our Lord and His Christ will reign forever (Daniel 7:13-14). I have hope that the gospel will win. The nations will bow to the Lordship of the King. Every knee in fact will bow to the glory of the Lord Jesus (Philippians 2:5-11).
I write this because it is easy to be discouraged. Islam is growing. The cults are thriving. The false gospels are being preached. Jesus is being attacked at every turn. The national media hates the gospel. The President of the United States is a pagan. The nations reject the Word of God.
Yet Jesus is still Lord and He will reign forever! I pray that the nations repent. I pray that our nations turn to faith in Christ. I pray for the gospel to go forth and sinners turn from their sins and turn in saving faith to the Lord Jesus. I pray that God Almighty would have mercy and send a revival to the nations. He can turn the tide. The Lord turned the tide in ancient Rome and He can turn the tide in our wicked nations. I pray He does for His glory and for His name.
I enjoy Chris Rosebrough and his podcast “Fighting for the Faith.” Chris often uses satire and comedy to point out false teachers and teachings. His podcast often has sermon reviews of both good and bad sermons and Chris will point out why they are that. I am often amazed at what passes for sermons these days. Much of what seems to be coming out of the seeker church is not even close to true biblical teaching. It is more or less about “us.” It is man-centered to its core.
I have written often on the need for expository teaching and more sound doctrine being preached. Just this week while working I was pondering why people enjoy attending seeker churches where doctrine is minimized and those who desire to go “deeper” with their faith are criticized. I want to ask them, “How can you sit under this guy and learn anything? What has he taught you that brought you closer to Christ, deeper in your theological understanding of the gospel?” Heck, most of the teachers Chris plays on his podcast have no gospel understanding. The seeker churches are just “say this prayer and become a Christian” as their gospel.
I subscribe to a local church here in my city that has been sucking people from the more traditional churches (mainly Baptist churches) for some time. They started at about 50 people or so and today have over 1000. Because of their growth, church leaders often avoid criticizing them because of their growth. They are instead esteemed. I point out that growth is no indicator of truth. Look at the cults. Look at Islam. Truth is not pragmatic. Truth is truth and God’s Word declares the truth of God (John 17:17). Jesus said that He is the truth (John 14:6). God has given us His truth through His Word (2 Timothy 3:16-17). We need no other “truth.” Yet many are unwilling to take the truth of the Bible and examine the teachings of large seeker churches because of their numbers.
Each week I get their Sunday services on my podcasts. I listen to their sermons. Why? Because I want to know if they are preaching truth. Often they are not. In fact, they often are preaching nothing at all. They are currently preaching through John but they are not expository nor are they dealing with their text. They often just read the text and fill in stories about themselves or others to pass the time. They are not false teachers. They are “un-teachers.” They are teaching neither bad doctrine nor good. They are teaching nothing. They just focus on “us.”
This is true nearly of all seeker churches that I know. The focus is on “us” and not Jesus. The gospel is not about the glory of God, the atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ, His sacrifice for our sins, along with His death, burial, and bodily resurrection from the dead where He now sits at the right hand of God to pray for us. No! The “gospel” of seeker churches is on “us.” It is about “us” and our glory. The gospel of seeker churches is about Jesus coming to give us an “abundant life” or to give us a “hope and a future” (both John 10:10 and Jeremiah 29:11 are seriously abused and destroyed there).
Just this past week I listened to two seeker churches Resurrection Day services. Both were focused on “us.” The gospel was not taught. The focus was not on the bodily resurrection of Jesus from the dead. The focus was on God resurrecting your dreams. Neither church preached repentance for the forgiveness of our sins (Luke 24:47). Neither church even mentioned repentance at all. Both did mention sin but only in passing. Sin is what keeps us down, what keeps us from reading our potential. Gone is the truth of the gospel of repentance.
The gospel is not lost. It is easily found in the Bible. One can skip it. One can downplay it. But one cannot ignore it altogether. Just reading the New Testament brings us face to face with our sins, with our inability to save ourselves by our good works, with the fact that we are enemies of God because of our rebellion against His law (Romans 3:19-20). We find that our world is not getting better by works of the flesh but we realize that we must repent of our sins if we are to have peace with God (Acts 2:37-39; 3:19-20). We find that repentance brings salvation (2 Corinthians 7:10). We find that Christ alone saves us from the wrath of God by His grace and mercy (Romans 5:1). The gospel is focused on the person and work of the Lord Jesus (Ephesians 1:3-14 and notice how many times “He” is mentioned and we are not). Salvation is not accomplished by making amends or trying harder or your good deeds (Romans 4:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:5-7). Salvation is the gracious work of God wrought in us by His Spirit through the saving work of the Lord Jesus.
Until next time, keep loving and living in the gospel.
Every since I became a disciple of Jesus, reading my Bible and prayer have been priorities in my life. I by no means am perfect at them. I am thankful for the gospel and the fact that I don’t earn my righteousness before God through my works (Romans 10:4; Philippians 3:9; Titus 3:5-7). There have been good days where I have been in the Word and in prayer and it seemed the Lord was near. There have been days where I was in the Word and prayer and it seemed the Lord was distant. Thankfully, I am not saved by my feelings but by faith (Romans 5:1).
Let me rant then just for a moment about devotions, praying, and posting them on social media sites. I have seen this pattern for a while. The great satire site, the Babylon Bee, ran a great post on a woman completing her quite time without Instagramming it. That was pure gold because it is true! I go on social media sites and people are posting pictures of their Bibles open, a notebook, a cup of coffee.
Even open air preaching posts drive me crazy. I’m all for preaching the gospel in the open air. I also understand that some of these guys receive money from people and so they want them to see that they are serving just as they said they would. I find it ironic that missionaries don’t often feel the need to post them serving to prove they are actually doing what they said they would do if you supported them but I’ll let that go. Open air preachers are notorious for posting pictures or videos of themselves preaching or asking for prayer as they go to share the gospel. Again, I understand that for some of them, the prayer requests are real and their posting is simply to encourage people to follow their lead in evangelism. Yet for some, I fear, they are posting out of pride (“look at me going to share my faith while you read this blog”). God knows our hearts.
In Matthew 6 Jesus had strong words about doing things for the glory of God and not telling others about them. There is no doubt that God knows our hearts (1 Chronicles 28:9; Jeremiah 17:10; 23:24; Romans 8:27). The Lord sees through our posts to know our hearts whether we are truly posting for His glory or for ours. In Matthew 6 Jesus states that our good works should be done in secret so that we might receive a reward from our Father. Again, nothing wrong with posting about our devotions, our church, our evangelism but God knows our hearts and whether we want the applause of men or not. Jesus states that our giving (Matthew 6:2-4), praying (6:5-8), and fasting (6:16-18) should be done in secret and not for the applause of men. Our Lord states that if do them for men, we receive our rewards (6:2, 5, 16).
Pride is dangerous. I have battled pride my entire life. I always will. We all like for people to pat us on the back and tell us “good job.” We want others to notice the good we do. It’s human nature I suppose. But Jesus tells us to do our good works for our Father. Ephesians 2:10 even states that our Father has prepared the works for us to do. This would include our prayer times, our fasting, our evangelism. Our works should glorify God, however, and not us. The temptation is to post on social media sites so that our good works glorify us even though we claim it is to the glory of God.
Finally, is it sinful to post our prayer times, our Bible study, our evangelism? It can be. It doesn’t have to be. Again, the Lord God knows our hearts. We can’t hide from Him. Like Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5, the Lord knows if we are hypocrites or not. In Acts 4 we read that Joseph called Barnabas (son of encouragement) sold a field and brought the money to the Apostles’ feet. This must have impressed Ananias and Sapphira so they did the same but unlike Barnabas, they withheld some money for themselves (which was their right) but they claimed to be giving all to the Lord. The Lord saw their hypocrisy and He judged them before the church so that fear came upon the saints of God (Acts 5:11). Ananias and Sapphira wanted the applause of men but were not willing to truly glorify God like Barnabas had done. They wanted to cheat but the Lord saw their hearts (Acts 5:3). The Lord knew the heart of Barnabas and He also knew that Ananias and Sapphira were not willing to pay the price that Barnabas had paid though they wanted the applause of the Apostles too. Their story is for our example.
The Lord knows our hearts. He knows if I post a picture of me sharing my faith if I’m doing it for me or for His glory. He knows the same for people who use social media to brag about their devotions or their street preaching. I have no doubt that the Lord loves us beyond words even in the midst of our hypocrisy and pride but I pray that He would sanctify us so that social media is not our place for our hypocrisy and pride.
Now let me go post this on various social media sites along with some pictures I have of me praying before blogging this. Prayers appreciated.